User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; SM-T217S Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.136 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet-1.yml
Chrome 33.0.1750.136Android 4.2.2Blink SamsungGALAXY Tab 3 7.0"tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.049 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.136closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.136closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.25403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.2SamsungGALAXY Tab 3 7.0"tabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.136closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 33.0.1750closeAndroid 4.2.2SamsungSM-T217Scloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.136WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2SamsungGalaxy Tabcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 33Blink Android 4.2.2SamsungGalaxy Tab 3 (7.0)tabletyescloseclose0.027 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.136closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 33closeAndroid 4.2SamsungSM-T217STabletyesyescloseclose0.052 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:32 | by ThaDafinser