User agent detail

MOT-V188/0B.D2.2BR MIB/2.2.1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaV188 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2 MotorolaV188Mobile Phoneyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-V188 0B.D2.2BRcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2.1close MotorolaV188mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
MotorolaV188smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaV188closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MIB 2.2.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini MotorolaMotorola V188closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2.1 MotorolaV188mobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close MotorolaV188Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.035 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:32 | by ThaDafinser