User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Symbian; U; de-DE) AppleWebKit/534.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) GPSInfoQtApp148/1.0 (Nokia; Qt) Mobile Safari/534.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokiade-DE) AppleWebKit/534.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) GPSInfoQtApp148/1.0 (Nokia Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.039 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeSymbian OS mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Symbian NokiaQtsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 534.3closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari close Nokiade-DE) AppleWebKit/534.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) GPSInfoQtApp148/1.0 (Nokiacloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeSymbian closecloseclosecloseclose0.18002 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 534.3 NokiaMobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 534.3 closeclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:32 | by ThaDafinser