User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux mipsel; U; HbbTV/1.1.1 (; TOSHIBA; DTV_TL933; 64.4.08.7; t12; ) ; ToshibaTP/1.3.0 (+VIDEO_MP4+VIDEO_X_MS_ASF+AUDIO_MPEG+AUDIO_MP4+DRM+3D+NATIVELAUNCH+OFFLINEAPP+WEBSTORAGE) ; pl) AppleWebKit/534.1 (KHTML, like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
TOSHIBADTV_TL933 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Apple Mail closeLinux email-clientcloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
GNU/Linux ToshibaDTV TL933tv0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeLinux TOSHIBADTV_TL933closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.32403 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 534.1Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 534.1 ToshibaRegza TL933 Smart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:31 | by ThaDafinser