User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-CA; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020314 Netscape6/6.2.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Windows ME Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 6.0Gecko WinME MEWindows DesktopDesktop0.06 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Navigator 6.2.2closeWindows 4.90desktop-browsercloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Netscape 6.2Gecko Windows MEdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Netscape Navigator 6.2.2close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Netscape 6.2.2closeWindows ME closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Netscape 6.2.2closeWindows Me closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 6.2.2Gecko 20020314Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.38604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape 6.2.2Gecko 0.9.4Windows MEdesktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:30 | by ThaDafinser