User agent detail

Android 4.1;AppleWebKit/533.1;Build/GRK39F;LG-L38Cjellybean Build/GRK39F
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGL38Cjellybean Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 533.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.3.6LGL38Cjellybeanmobile-browseryescloseclose0.30103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1LGL38Cjellybeansmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.1closeAndroid 4.1LGL38Cjellybeancloseclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit 533.1Android 4.1LGLGL38Cjellybeancloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.6LGOptimus Dynamicmobile:smartyescloseclose0.025 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.056 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:29 | by ThaDafinser