User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; DJC Touchtab4 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1700.99 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
VersusTouchtab4 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 32.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.11 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.27603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 32.0Blink Android 4.2tabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 32.0.1700closeAndroid 4.2.2VersusTouchtab4closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.15102 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 32.0.1700.99WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 32Blink Android 4.2.2DJC Touchtab4tabletyescloseclose0.08501 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.061 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:29 | by ThaDafinser