User agent detail

Mozilla/4.03 [en] (X11; I; HP-UX A.09.04 9000/816)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-unix.yaml
Netscape Communicator 4.0.3HP-UX 9.04 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Communicator 4.0.3closeHP-UX 9.04desktop-browsercloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
HP-UX desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.03close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 4.3 a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.53605 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape Communicator 4.0.3 HP-UX 9.04desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:29 | by ThaDafinser