User agent detail

DoCoMo/2.0 T2101V(c100)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/carrier-docomo.yaml
ToshibaT2101Vmobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
DoCoMo 2.0 JAVA Mobile Deviceyes0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
DoCoMo 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront close DoCoMomobile-browseryescloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
DoCoMoT2101Vfeature phoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close DoCoMoT2101Vcloseclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
T2101Vcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
ToshibaT2101Vmobile:featureyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
docomo T2101Vcloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close DoCoMoT2101VFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:28 | by ThaDafinser