User agent detail

GT-S5600/<$PHONEVERSION> Opera/* (J2ME; $OS; Opera Widgets Mobi/*
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-S5600 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile closeTouchwiz SamsungPrestonmobile-browseryescloseclose0.20002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SamsungGT-S5600smartphoneyes0.018 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera *close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SamsungGT-S5600closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile Touchwiz SamsungPrestonmobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:27 | by ThaDafinser