User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows CE 4.21; rv:1.8.1a3) Gecko/20060610 Minimo/0.016
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsce.yaml
Minimo 0.016Windows CE 4.21Gecko 1.8.1a3mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.8Gecko 1.8 Desktop0.056 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Minimo 0.016closeWindows 4.21GenericWindows Mobilemobile-browseryescloseclose0.21902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.8closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Minimo closeWindows CE closeclosecloseclose0.02 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Minimo 0.016closeWindows CE 4.21closecloseclosecloseclose0.08701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.8.1a3Gecko 20060610Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.39804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Minimo 0.016Gecko 1.8.1a3Windows CE 4.21mobile:featureyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:27 | by ThaDafinser