User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SGH-i917/UCWEB2.2.0.157/47/32079
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-i917 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-SGH-i917 UCWEB2.2.0.157closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 2.2 SamsungSGH-i917smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 2.2.0close SamsungSGH-i917closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.2.0.157close closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 2.2.0.157 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.39804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 2.2Gecko SamsungSGH-i917mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:27 | by ThaDafinser