User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
IE 11.0Win10 10.07.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 11.0Trident 7.0Win10 10.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 11.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:11.0closeWindows 10.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident Windows 10desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 11.0closeWindows 10.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 11.0closeWindows 10 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 11.0closeWindows 10 closecloseclosecloseclose0.08601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident 7.0Windows Windows NT 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident 7.0Windows 10desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 11.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 11closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:26 | by ThaDafinser