User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; N; WinNT; en-US; m14) Netscape6/6.0b1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Windows NT Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Navigator 6.0b1closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Netscape 6.0 Windows NTdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Netscape Navigator 6.0b1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Netscape 6.0.0closeWindows NT closeclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 6.0b1 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape 6.0 Windows desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:26 | by ThaDafinser