User agent detail

Audible, Android, 1.5.5, tmo_de, HTC Desire S, htc_saga, 2.3.5, 1.0, mobile; Retry: 1/5/5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCDesire S, htc_saga, 2.3.5, 1.0, mobile Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Audible closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid HTCDesiremobile-browseryescloseclose0.25002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android HTCDesire Ssmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid HTCDesire S, htc_saga, 2.3.5, 1.0, mobilecloseclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android HTC Desire Scloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android HTCDesiremobile:smartyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.054 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:26 | by ThaDafinser