User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SAMSUNG; SAMSUNG-GT-S5250/1.0; U; bada/1.0; es) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Dolfin/2.0 Mobile WQVGA SMM-MMS/1.2.0 OPN-B
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSAMSUNG-GT-S5250 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dolfin 2.0WebKit Bada 1.0SamsungGT-S5250Mobile Phoneyes0.133 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 533.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Dolphin 2.0closeBada SamsungGT-S5250mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Dolphin 2.0WebKit Bada 1.0SamsungGT-S5250smartphoneyes0.014 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dolfin 2.0close SamsungSAMSUNG-GT-S5250closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Dolfin 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0WebKit 533.1 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dolfin 2.0Webkit 533.1Bada 1.0SamsungWave 525mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SamsungGT-S5250Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.022 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:25 | by ThaDafinser