User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+7.0;+Windows+NT+5.1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
yesFake BrowserBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake BrowserBot/Crawler0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Internet Explorer closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.20202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer +Windows+NT+5.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.06401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer Windows desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:25 | by ThaDafinser