User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/45.1.99 like Chrome/45.0.2454.94 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-810.php
Silk 45.1Android unknownunknown AmazonKindleEbook Readeryesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Silk 45.1Blink Android AmazonKindleEbook Readeryesyes0.026 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 45.1.99closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 45.0.2454.94closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 45.0Blink GNU/Linux AmazonKindle Firetabletyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.94closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 45.1.99closeLinux AmazonKindlecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 45.0.2454.94closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Silk 45.1.99WebKit 537.36Fire OS AmazonKindlecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Silk 45.1Blink FireOS AmazonKindle Firetabletyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.94closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Amazon Silk Browser 1.0closeAndroid 2.3AmazonD01400Tabletyesyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:25 | by ThaDafinser