User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.3.154.9 Safari/525.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-chrome.yaml
Chrome Beta 0.3.154.9Windows 7Webkit 525.19desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.17 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 0.3.154.9closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 0.3.154.9closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 0.3WebKit Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 0.3.154.9closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 0.3.154closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.02 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 0.3.154.9closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 0.3.154.9WebKit 525.19Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Beta 0.3.154.9Webkit 525.19Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 0.3.154.9closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 0.2.149.6closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:25 | by ThaDafinser