User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.3; HTC Inspire 4G Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.133 Mobile Safari/535.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCInspire 4G Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.078 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 18.0.1025.133closeAndroid 4.0.3HTCInspire 4Gmobile-browseryescloseclose0.24603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 18.0WebKit Android 4.0HTCInspire 4Gsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 18.0.1025closeAndroid 4.0.3HTCInspire 4Gcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.07601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.133WebKit 535.19Android 4.0.3HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 18Webkit 535.19Android 4.0.3HTCInspire 4Gmobile:smartyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 18closeAndroid 4.0HTCInspire 4GSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.083 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:25 | by ThaDafinser