User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Windows NT 6; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.12 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/9.0.587.0 Safari/534.12
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
Chrome 9.0WinNT unknownunknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 9.0WebKit WinNT Windows DesktopDesktop0.138 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 9.0.587.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 9.0.587.0closeWindows 6desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 9.0WebKit Windows NTdesktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 9.0.587.0closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 9.0.587closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 9.0.587.0closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.06401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 9.0.587.0WebKit 534.12Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 9.0.587.0Webkit 534.12Windows desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 9.0.587.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 9.1.0.0closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.132 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:24 | by ThaDafinser