User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/39.0.2171.99 Safari/537.36 LBBROWSER
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-577.php
liebao 0.0Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
liebao Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 39.0.2171.99closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 39.0.2171.99closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.24502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Liebao WebKit Windows 7desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 39.0.2171.99closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 39.0.2171closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 39.0.2171.99closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.08701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
LB Browser WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
LieBao Blink Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 39.0.2171.99closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 39.0.2171.99closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:24 | by ThaDafinser