User agent detail

LG-GD510/V100 Teleca/WAP2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-obigo.yaml
Obigo WAP 2.0 LGGD510mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo JAVA LGGD510Mobile Phoneyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-GD510 V100closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM LGGD510mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo LGGD510smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close LGGD510closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Teleca-Obigo close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
LGLGGD510closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.38904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo WAP 2.0 LGGD510mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close LGGD510Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:23 | by ThaDafinser