User agent detail

PhilipsX2300/W1245_V12 ThreadX_OS/4.0 MOCOR/W12 Release/11.08.2012 Browser/Dorado1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-threadx.yaml
Dorado 1.0ThreadX 4.0 PhilipsX2300mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
PhilipsX2300 W1245closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Dorado 1.0closeThreadX 4.0PhilipsX2300mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
ThreadX PhilipsX2300smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close PhilipsX2300closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dorado 1.0 ThreadX 4.0PhilipsX2300mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close PhilipsX2300Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:23 | by ThaDafinser