User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux mn10300; U; HbbTV/1.1.1 (+PVR; Panasonic; DIGA M9031; 3.030; ; ); en) Presto/2.9.167 Version/11.50
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
Opera 11.50GNU/Linux Presto 2.9.167PanasonicDIGA M9031tv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.50Presto 2.9Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 11.50closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.50Presto GNU/Linux Panasonictv0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeLinux PanasonicDIGA M9031closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.10101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 11.50Presto 2.9.167Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 3.1Presto 2.9.167 PanasonicDIGA M9031televisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:23 | by ThaDafinser