User agent detail

HTC_Touch_Pro2_T7373 Opera/9.7 (Windows NT 5.1; U; xx)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsmobile.yaml
Opera Mobile 9.7Windows Mobile HTCTouch Pro 2mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 9.7Presto 2.2 HTCTouch Pro2 T7373Mobile Phoneyes0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 9.7closeWindows 5.1HTCTouch Pro2 T7373mobile-browseryescloseclose0.17702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.7Presto Windows XPHTCTouch Pro2 T7373smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.7closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.7closeWindows XP HTCTouch_Pro2_T7373closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.7closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.045 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.7 Windows Windows NT 5.1HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 9.7 Windows Mobile HTCTouch Pro 2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.7closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close HTCTouch Pro2 T7373Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:23 | by ThaDafinser