User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131030 conkeror/1.0pre (Debian-1.0~~pre+git131116-1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Conkeror 1.0Debian 1.0Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Conkeror 1.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Conkeror 1.0Gecko Debian 1.0desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Conkeror 1.0closeDebian closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Conkeror 1.0precloseLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.04601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 17.0Gecko 20131030Linux 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Conkeror 1.0Gecko 17.0Debian desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:23 | by ThaDafinser