User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Series40; NokiaC3-01.5/06.50; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) Gecko/20100401 S40OviBrowser/2.0.2.68.14
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaC3-01 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia Proxy Browser 2.0Gecko SymbianOS NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.065 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
IBrowse close desktop-browsercloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Ovi Browser 2.0Gecko Symbian OS Series 40 NokiaC3-01smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 06.50;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Ovi Browser 2.0.2closeNokia Series 40 NokiaC3-01closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.10001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Ovi Browser 2.0.2.68.14Gecko 20100401NokiaOS NokiaNokia C3-01closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia Xpress 2.0.2Gecko Series40 NokiaC3-01mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
S40 Ovi Browser 2.0closeNokia Series 40 NokiaC3-01Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:22 | by ThaDafinser