User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Windows; U; wds 7.10; xx; NOKIA; Lumia 510) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/3.2.0.340 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsphone.yaml
UC Browser 3.2Windows Phone 7.5Gecko NokiaLumia 510mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 3.2U2 WinPhone7 7.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeWindows NokiaLumia 510mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 3.2 Windows NokiaLumia 510smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 1.0.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 3.2.0closeWindows Phone 7.10NokiaLumia 510closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 3.2.0.340 Windows NokiaLumia 510closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 3.2Gecko Windows Phone 7.5NokiaLumia 510mobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 3closeWindows Phone 7.5NokiaLumia 510Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.032 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:21 | by ThaDafinser