User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Windows) Version/12.02
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 12.02Windows desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.02closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.80closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.02Presto Windows desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.02close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.2closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.02close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.2 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 12.02 Windows desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.02closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:21 | by ThaDafinser