User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en) Opera 8.01
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
Opera 8.01WinXP 5.11.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 8.01Presto 1.0WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 8.01closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 8.01Presto Windows XPdesktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 8.01closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.1closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 8.01closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.07301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 8.1 Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 8.01 Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 8.01closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 8.52closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:20 | by ThaDafinser