User agent detail

Microsoft Office/15.0 (Windows NT 6.2; Microsoft PowerPoint 15.0.4693; Pro)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-573.php
PowerPoint 2013Win8 6.2unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
PowerPoint 2013Trident Win8 6.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Microsoft closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows 8desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeChrome OS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:18 | by ThaDafinser