User agent detail

Opera/8.01 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/1.1.2801/hifi/tmobile/de; Samsung D600; ru; U; ssr)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungD600 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 1.1Presto 2.2JAVA Mobile Deviceyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 1.1.2801closeJVM mobile-browseryescloseclose0.22702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 1.1Presto SamsungD600smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 1.1.2801close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 1.1.2801close SamsungD600closeclosecloseclose0.02 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 1.1.2801close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 1.1.2801 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 1.1 SamsungD600; ru; U; ssrmobile:featureyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 8.01closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:18 | by ThaDafinser