User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; proximic; +http://www.proximic.com/info/spider.php)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-092.php
yesproximicBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesproximicBot/Crawler0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesproximicclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesspiderclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
PHP close closecloseclosecloseclose0.13901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Proximic Search Crawler closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:17 | by ThaDafinser