User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.5; Linux) KHTML/3.5.9 (like Gecko) (Kubuntu)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Konqueror 3.5Kubuntu KHTML 3.5.9desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Konqueror 3.5KHTML Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.038 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 3.5closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 3.5KHTML Kubuntu desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 3.5;closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 3.5closeKubuntu closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 3.5closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.18802 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 3.5 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 3.5KHTML 3.5.9Kubuntu desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:17 | by ThaDafinser