User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; xx; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111109 Red Hat/3.6-3.el5_7 Firefox/3.6.24
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Firefox 3.6.24Red Hat 5.7Gecko 1.9.2desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.6Gecko 1.9.2Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.6.24closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.6.24closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.6Gecko Red Hat 3.6desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.6.24closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.6.24closeRed Hat 3.6closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.6.24closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.10501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.6.24Gecko 20111109Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.6.24Gecko 1.9.2Red Hat 5.7desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.6.24closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:17 | by ThaDafinser