User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-B5310/B5310DDIK5 SHP/VPP/R5 Dolfin/1.5 Nextreaming SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-dolfin.yaml
Dolfin 1.5Touchwiz 2.0 SamsungCorby Promobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-GT-B5310 B5310DDIK5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Dolphin 1.5close SamsungGT B5310mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Dolphin 1.5WebKit SamsungGT-B5310smartphoneyes0.014 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dolfin 1.5close SamsungGT-B5310closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Dolfin 1.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dolfin 1.5 Touchwiz 2.0SamsungCorby Promobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SamsungGT B5310Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:17 | by ThaDafinser