User agent detail

iCab/5.5 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-821.php
iCab 5.5MacOSX 10unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
iCab 5.5WebKit MacOSX 10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
iCab 5.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
iCab 5.5closeOS X desktop-browsercloseclose0.20702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
iCab 5.5WebKit Mac desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
iCab 5.5closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
iCab 5.5closeMac OS X closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
iCab 5.5closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.05201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
iCab 5.5 Mac OS X closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
iCab 5.5 OS X desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:17 | by ThaDafinser