User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/44.0.2403.155 UBrowser/5.4.4237.1032 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 5.4Windows VistaBlink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 44.0Blink WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.155closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 44.0.2403.155closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 44.0Blink Windows Vistadesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.155closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 44.0.2403closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 44.0.2403.155closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.044 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 44.0.2403.155WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 5.4Blink Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.155closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 44.0.2403.125closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.022 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:15 | by ThaDafinser