User agent detail

MOT-2001./10.01 UP/4.1.21b UP.Browser/4.1.21b-XXXX
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Motorola2001 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 Mobile Phoneyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-2001 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.21bclose Motorola2001mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 Motorola2001.smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 4.1.21close Motorola2001closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.21b closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.60606 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 4.1 Motorola2001mobile:featureyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Motorola2001Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.035 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:14 | by ThaDafinser