User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131030 Firefox/17.0 Iceweasel/17.0.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Iceweasel 17.0.10GNU/Linux Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Iceweasel 17.0Gecko 17.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.04 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 17.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IceWeasel 17.0.10closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Iceweasel 17.0Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 17.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Iceweasel 17.0.10closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iceweasel 17.0.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Iceweasel 17.0.10Gecko 20131030Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Iceweasel 17.0.10Gecko 17.0Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 17.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:13 | by ThaDafinser