User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.3; AIRIS OnePAD 730 Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.166 Mobile Safari/535.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AirisOnePAD 730 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.093 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.0.3GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 18.0WebKit Android 4.0smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 18.0.1025closeAndroid 4.0.3AirisOnePAD 730closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iris closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.054 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166WebKit 535.19Android 4.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 18Webkit 535.19Android 4.0.3AIRIS OnePAD 730mobile:smartyescloseclose0.08701 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.057 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:13 | by ThaDafinser