User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone 5SGLOBAL; CPU iPhone OS 7_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/537.51.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 MQQBrowser/5.0.5 Mobile/11D167 Safari/8536.25
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone.yml
QQ Browser 5.0.5iOS 7.1WebKit AppleiPhone 5Ssmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 6.0WebKit iOS 7.1AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.048 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS 7.1AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.19702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 5.0WebKit iOS 7.1AppleiPhone 5Ssmartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 6.0closeiOS 7.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 5.0.5closeiOS 7.1closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 6.0closeiPhone OS 7.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.09301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 5.0.5WebKit 537.51.2iOS 7.1AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 5.0Webkit 537.51.2iOS 7.1AppleiPhone 5mobile:smartyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:13 | by ThaDafinser