User agent detail

Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; MSIE 3.02; Update a; AOL 3.0; Windows 95)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Internet Explorer 3.02Windows 95Trident desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 2.0Gecko Desktop0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 3.02closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
AOL Explorer 3.0closeWindows 95desktop-browsercloseclose0.35204 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 3.02Trident Windows 95desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 3.02closeWindows 95closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 3.2closeWindows 95 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
AOL 3.0closeWindows 95 closecloseclosecloseclose0.05801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 3.2Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 3.0.2 Windows 95desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 3.02closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:13 | by ThaDafinser