User agent detail

samsung-gt-s5620b/UC Browser7.6.1.82/69/351 UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Samsunggt-s5620b Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.6WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.04 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
samsung-gt-s5620b UCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 7.6.1.82closeTouchwiz SamsungMontemobile-browseryescloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.6 Samsunggt-s5620bsmartphoneyes0.012 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.6.1close Samsunggt-s5620bcloseclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.6.1.82 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.6Gecko Touchwiz SamsungMontemobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close J2ME MidletFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:13 | by ThaDafinser