User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.2; ru; s4502 Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/9.6.3.413 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 9.6Android 4.1unknown DNSS4502Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.6U3 Android 4.1DNSS4502Mobile Phoneyesyes0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.2DNSS4502Mmobile-browseryescloseclose0.28203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.6WebKit Android 4.1yes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.6.3closeAndroid 4.1.2s4502closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.12801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.6.3.413WebKit 533.1Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.6Webkit 533.1Android 4.1.2s4502mobile:smartyescloseclose0.08601 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:12 | by ThaDafinser