User agent detail

MOT-VE538/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Browser/UP.Browser/7.2.7.2 (GUI) MMP/2.0 Push/PO
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaVE538 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-VE538 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2.7.2close MotorolaVE538mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.2 MotorolaVE538smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 7.2.7close MotorolaVE538closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 7.2.7.2 MotorolaMotorola VE538closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 7.2 MotorolaVE538mobile:featureyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close MotorolaVE538Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.054 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:12 | by ThaDafinser