User agent detail

Panasonic-X800/1.0 SymbianOS/7.0 Series60/2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-symbian.yaml
Series60 2.0 PanasonicX800mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Panasonic-X800 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries60 2.0PanasonicX800mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia OSS Browser 2.0 Symbian OS Series 60 2.0PanasonicX800smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia OSS Browser 2.0closeSymbian OS 7.0closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 OSS 2.0closeSymbianOS 7.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.05901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Symbian closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series60 2.0PanasonicX800mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SymbianOS closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 7.0PanasonicX800Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:12 | by ThaDafinser