User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; P706 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.170 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MicromaxP706 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.166 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.170closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.170closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.27803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.2tabletyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.170closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 33.0.1750closeAndroid 4.2.2MicromaxP706closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.170WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.47505 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 33Blink Android 4.2.2P706tabletyescloseclose0.09501 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.170closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 33closeAndroid 4.2IPPOP706Tabletyesyescloseclose0.069 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:12 | by ThaDafinser