User agent detail

SonyEricssonK630i/R1CA Browser/NetFront/3.4 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonK630i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.4NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.074 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonK630i R1CAcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.4closeJVM SonyEricssonK630imobile-browseryescloseclose0.21202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.4NetFront Sony EricssonK630ifeature phoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.4close SonyEricssonK630icloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.4close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront Sony EricssonSony Ericsson K630icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.4 Sony EricssonK630imobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.4close SonyEricssonK630iFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.121 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:11 | by ThaDafinser